Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-based dual therapy vs. bismuth-based quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication: a GRADE-assessed systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

Chen Liang A, Cruz Castillo Y, Murrieta Bruciaga LM, Abreu Lopez B, Covarrubias SB, Flores Uribe HJ, Salolin-Vargas VP, Flores Monar G et al.

Frontiers in microbiology, 2026

4,410 participants

Abstract

Background Helicobacter pylori infects approximately 4. 4 billion individuals worldwide, causing chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric adenocarcinoma. The 2024 ACG guideline recommends bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT) as first-line treatment when susceptibility is unknown, while vonoprazan–amoxicillin (VA) dual therapy is conditionally endorsed as an alternative. Prior meta-analyses included vonoprazan-containing BQT control arms, introducing heterogeneity that may influence comparative efficacy estimates. This analysis addresses that gap by restricting the comparator to conventional PPI-based BQT. Methods A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library was conducted through April 2026 (PROSPERO: CRD420251108849) for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). All comparator arms were restricted to conventional PPI-based BQT. Outcomes included eradication rate, total adverse events (AE), nausea, diarrhea, treatment compliance, and bitter taste. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach and trial sequential analysis. Meta-analysis was performed using R software. Results From 17,661 screened articles, 15 RCTs comprising 4,410 patients were included. Pooled eradication rates were 86.4% with VA and 85.0% with BQT, with no statistically significant difference (RR 1.03, 95% CI 1.00–1.07; p = 0.05; I 2 = 46.1%). VA significantly reduced total AEs (17.1% vs. 35.4%; RR 0.48, 95% CI…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 4,410 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free