A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-controlled, Phase 2, Therapeutic Exploratory Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of DWP14012 in Patients With Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of DWP14012 compared to esomeprazole in the treatment of erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease classified as Los Angeles(LA) classification grades A to D.
Conditions: Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Primary outcome: Ratio of subjects who were completely cured of mucosal defects by 8 weeks.
Enrollment: 211 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 211 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study
- Treatment and prognostic factors for long-term outcome in patients with anti-N-Methyl-D-Aspartate (NMDA) receptor encephalitis: a cohort study
- Effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine up to 6 months in a large integrated health system in the USA: a retrospective cohort study
- Postsurgical prescriptions for opioid naive patients and association with overdose and misuse: retrospective cohort study
- Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in SARS-CoV-2 infection: prospective cohort study using UK Biobank
- Timing of high-efficacy therapy for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective observational cohort study
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.