Evidence Hub

Perioperative ctDNA-based Molecular Residual Disease Detection for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study (LUNGCA-1)

L. Xia, J. Mei, Ran Kang, S. Deng, Yaohui Chen, Ying Yang, G. Feng, Yulan Deng et al.

Clinical Cancer Research, 2021

224 citations

Abstract

PURPOSE

We assessed whether perioperative circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be a biomarker for early detection of molecular residual disease (MRD) and prediction of postoperative relapse in resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Based on our prospective, multicenter cohort on dynamic monitoring of ctDNA in lung cancer surgery patients (LUNGCA), we enrolled 950 plasma samples obtained at three perioperative time points (before surgery, 3-day and 1-month after surgery) of 330 stage I-III NSCLC patients (LUNGCA-1), as a part of LUNGCA cohort. Using a customized 769-gene panel, somatic mutations in tumor tissues and plasma samples were identified with next-generation sequencing and utilized for ctDNA-based MRD analysis.

RESULTS

Preoperative ctDNA positivity was associated with lower recurrence-free survival (RFS) (HR=4.2; P<0.001). The presence of MRD (ctDNA positivity at postoperative 3-day and/or 1-month) was a strong predictor for disease relapse (HR=11.1; P<0.001). ctDNA-based MRD had a higher relative contribution to RFS prediction than all clinicopathological variables such as the TNM stage. Furthermore, MRD-positive patients who received adjuvant therapies had improved RFS over those not receiving adjuvant therapy (HR=0.3; P=0.008), whereas MRD-negative patients receiving adjuvant therapies had lower RFS than their counterparts without adjuvant therapy (HR=3.1; P<0.001). After adjusting for clinicopathological variables, whether receiving…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free