Evidence Hub

Oral Anticoagulant and Reduced Risk of Dementia in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Population-Based Cohort Study

P. Mongkhon, L. Fanning, Wallis C. Y. Lau, G. Tse, Kui-Kai Lau, Li Wei, C. Kongkaew, I. Wong

Heart Rhythm, 2020

84,521 participants · 73 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It remains unclear whether oral anticoagulation (OAC) can prevent dementia or cognitive impairment (CI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the risk of dementia/CI among AF patients with and without OAC treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study using UK primary care data (2000-2017). Participants with newly diagnosed AF without a history of dementia/CI were identified. Inverse probability of treatment weights based on propensity-scores and Cox regression were used to compare the dementia outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 84,521 patients with AF, 35,245 patients were on OAC treatment, 49,276 received no OAC treatment and of these, 29,282 patients were on antiplatelets. Over a mean follow-up of 5.9 years, 5,295 patients developed dementia/CI. OAC treatment was associated with a lower risk of dementia/CI compared to no OAC treatment (hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.85-0.95, p<0.001) or antiplatelets (HR=0.84, 95% CI=0.79-0.90, p<0.001). No significant difference in dementia risk was observed for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) versus warfarin (HR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.70-1.14, p=0.373), whereas dual therapy (OAC plus an antiplatelet agent) was associated with a higher risk of dementia/CI compared with no treatment (HR 1.17, 95% CI, 1.05-1.31), p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

OAC use was associated with a lower risk of dementia/CI compared to non-OAC and antiplatelet treatment among AF patients. The evidence for DOAC…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 84,521 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free