Evidence Hub

The implementation of modern guideline-directed medical therapy among hospitalized patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: real-world experience from two tertiary cardiac centers

F. Bánfi-Bacsárdi, Á. Kazay, T. Fuzesi, D. Pilecky, M. Vámos, T. Gergely, Z. Majoros, G. Torok et al.

European Heart Journal, 2024

560 participants

Abstract

According to the 2021 ESC HF Guidelines (GLs), the conventional triple therapy (TT) (RASi+βB+MRA) of HFrEF has been supplemented with the SGLT2 inhibitor dapa- and empagliflozin as the fourth pillar of the foundational quadruple therapy (QT) recommended for all HFrEF patients.

To assess the changes in the implementation of GDMT and investigate its impact on the prognosis among hospitalized HFrEF patients in light of the 2021 HF GLs.

A retrospective data analysis of a consecutive cohort of HFrEF patients hospitalized due to HF between 01/01/2019 and 31/12/2023 at two tertiary cardiac centers was performed. Patients were classified into two groups: those hospitalized before and those after the publication of the 2021 ESC HF GLs (27/08/2021). Differences in the implementation of the drug therapy were analysed using the Chi-square test. 1-year all-cause mortality (ACM) was compared using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The independent predictors of the 1-year ACM were investigated with uni-, and multivariate Cox-regression analysis.

A total cohort of 560 patients (male: 76%, age: 63 [51-72] years, coronary artery disease: 46%, diabetes: 38%, atrial fibrillation: 44%, LVEF: 25 [20-30]%, eGFR: 57 [43-74]mL/min/1.73m²; NT-proBNP: 5574 [2529-10960]pg/mL) was treated with a high proportion of TT (80%) and with QT (TT + SGLT2i) in 34% at discharge. After the publication of the 2021 ESC HF GLs, the proportion of patients on these SGTL2is improved (10% vs 57%, p<0.001; in the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 560 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free