Evidence Hub

Medical treatments in ambulatory heart failure patients: First data from the BRING-UP-3 Heart Failure Study

Fabrizio Oliva, Francesco Orso, F. Colivicchi, M. Cipriani, A. Di Lenarda, D. Gabrielli, M. Gori, M. Gorini et al.

Journal of Cardiac Failure, 2025

3,830 participants · 9 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Current ESC guidelines introduced a four-pillar approach for the treatment of HFrEF, and a Class IA recommendation for Empagliflozin and Dapagliflozin in HFmrEF and HFpEF.

OBJECTIVES

BRING-UP-3 Heart Failure (HF) study was designed to guide the Guideline implementation recommendations in HF patients enrolled by a large sample of Italian cardiology sites.

METHODS

BRING-UP-3 HF study is an observational, prospective, nationwide investigation encompassing 179 sites enrolling ambulatory and hospitalized HF patients. The study includes an educational intervention followed by two three-month enrolment periods and by a 6-month follow-up period with end-point evaluation. For HFrEF patients, the objective is to describe the proportion of patients who receive the four pillars. Here we present the baseline data of the ambulatory cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 3,830 ambulatory patients were included in the study. The mean age was 70±12 years (34.5% over 75 years), females were 21.9%. The most prevalent group was HFrEF (58.4%), followed by HFimpEF (17.4%), HFmrEF (14.4%), and HFpEF (9.8%). Hypertension, atrial fibrillation, diabetes mellitus, and chronic kidney disease were reported in 68.2%, 40.4%, 31.0%, and 33.1%, respectively. In HFrEF patients, a high prescription rate (65%) for the four therapeutic pillars was observed; beta-blockers and RASi (mostly ARNIs) were prescribed in over 90% while SGLT2i and MRAs were prescribed in over 80% of cases. In HFmrEF and HFpEF, SGLT2i…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 3,830 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free