Evidence Hub

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Fosravuconazole, Itraconazole, and Hydroxyitraconazole in Sudanese Patients With Eumycetoma

Chu WY, Fahal AH, Ahmed ES, Bakhiet SM, Bakhiet OE, Fahal LA, Mohamed AA, Mohamedelamin ESW et al.

The Journal of infectious diseases, 2025

52 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The first clinical trial on eumycetoma was recently conducted in Sudan, comparing oral fosravuconazole, prodrug of active ravuconazole, with the standard-of-care oral itraconazole. Building on this trial, the present study aimed to characterize the pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics (PK-PD) of ravuconazole, itraconazole, and hydroxyitraconazole in patients with eumycetoma and guide selection of either a 200-mg or 300-mg dose of fosravuconazole.

METHODS: Nonlinear mixed-effects modeling was used to develop population PK models in 52 patients receiving 3 daily loading doses followed by weekly fosravuconazole (200 mg or 300 mg) or twice-daily itraconazole (total 400 mg), both over 12 months. Attainment of the in vitro 90% minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC90) for Madurella mycetomatis was assessed, and the relationships between drug exposure, lesion size reduction, and complete cure were evaluated.

RESULTS: Ravuconazole PK followed a 2-compartment model with Michaelis-Menten elimination and a 63% (95% confidence interval, 38%-90%) bioavailability increase during the loading phase, leading to 75% higher exposure for a 50% dose increase. Itraconazole and hydroxyitraconazole were modeled jointly, with autoinhibition of itraconazole metabolism. Free ravuconazole remained above the MIC90 throughout the entire 12-month treatment period, while free itraconazole never reached the MIC90. Despite a large range in antifungal exposure, no significant relationships were found…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 52 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free