Evidence Hub

S4.5a A randomized, double blind phase II proof-of-concept superiority trial of fosravuconazole 200 mg or 300 mg weekly dose versus itraconazole 400 mg daily, all three arms in combination with surgery, in patients with eumycetoma in Sudan—top line results

A. Fahal, S. Bakhiet, El Samani Wadaa Mohamed, E. Ahmed, Osama El Hadi Bakhiet, Abu Bakar Ahmed Yousif, L. Fahal, Hadel Yassir Atta Alla et al.

Medical Mycology, 2022

122 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objectives To determine whether, in addition to surgery, fosravuconazole (Fos) monotherapy of either 200 mg or 300 mg weekly was more effective [defined as complete cure at the End of Treatment (EOT; 52-week) visit] than the standard-of-care 12-month regimen of itraconazole (Itra) monotherapy, in patients with small to moderate eumycetoma lesions caused by Madurella mycetomatis. Methods This was a single-center (Mycetoma Research Center, Khartoum, Sudan), comparative, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, active-controlled, clinical superiority trial in participants with eumycetoma requiring surgery. Participants were randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio. In Arm 1 participants took a loading dose of Fos 300 mg on Day 1, Day 2, and Day 3, followed by a weekly dose of 300 mg for a total duration of 12 months. In Arm 2 participants took Fos 200 mg on Day 1, Day 2, and Day 3, followed by a weekly dose of 200 mg for a total duration of 12 months. In Arm 3 participants took Itra 400 mg daily for 12 months. All patients underwent surgery after 6 months of treatment in which the remaining lesion was removed. Mycetoma lesions were between 2 to ≤16 cm in diameter. The age cut-off was ≥15 years. The diagnosis of M. mycetomatis was confirmed by PCR. Safety monitoring included, among other, severe, and serious treatment-related events. Results A total of 122 participants were screened and 104 participants were enrolled (34 in Fos 300 mg, 34 in Fos 200 mg weekly, and 36 in Itra 400…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 122 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free