Evidence Hub

Associations of combined phenotypic ageing and genetic risk with incidence of chronic respiratory diseases in the UK Biobank: a prospective cohort study

Ting Wang, Weiwei Duan, Xinying Jia, Xin-Mei Huang, Yi Liu, Fan-Qing Meng, Chun-Hui Ni

European Respiratory Journal, 2023

308 participants · 105 citations

Abstract

Background Accelerated biological ageing has been associated with an increased risk of several chronic respiratory diseases. However, the associations between phenotypic age, a new biological age indicator based on clinical chemistry biomarkers, and common chronic respiratory diseases have not been evaluated. Methods We analysed data from 308 592 participants at baseline in the UK Biobank. The phenotypic age was calculated from chronological age and nine clinical chemistry biomarkers, including albumin, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, glucose, C-reactive protein, lymphocyte percent, mean cell volume, red cell distribution width and white blood cell count. Furthermore, phenotypic age acceleration (PhenoAgeAccel) was calculated by regressing phenotypic age on chronological age. The associations of PhenoAgeAccel with incident common chronic respiratory diseases and cross-sectional lung function were investigated. Moreover, we constructed polygenic risk scores and evaluated whether PhenoAgeAccel modified the effect of genetic susceptibility on chronic respiratory diseases and lung function. Results The results showed significant associations of PhenoAgeAccel with increased risk of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) (hazard ratio (HR) 1.52, 95% CI 1.45–1.59), COPD (HR 1.54, 95% CI 1.51–1.57) and asthma (HR 1.18, 95% CI 1.15–1.20) per 5-year increase and decreased lung function. There was an additive interaction between PhenoAgeAccel and the genetic risk for IPF and COPD.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cross-sectional, done in people. Its evidence level is 4 of 5 (Low · observational). Observational designs can show an association but not prove cause. Reported size: 308 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free