Evidence Hub

Impact of antiparasitic therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in chronic Chagas disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis

Anis Rassi, Alyssa Ann Grimshaw, Ashwin Sarwal, Ranjit Sah, Sangam Shah, Nelson Iván Agudelo Higuita, Fabio Mahamad Rassi, Michaele Francesco Corbisiero et al.

EClinicalMedicine, 2024

8,972 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

Background Endemic in more than 20 countries, Chagas disease affects 6.3 million people worldwide, leading to 28,000 new infections and 7700 deaths each year. Previous meta-analyses on antiparasitic treatment need updates to encompass recent studies and to assess key clinically meaningful endpoints. This study aims to evaluate the impact of antitrypanosomal therapy in preventing or reducing disease progression and mortality in chronic Chagas disease. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting the cardiovascular outcomes of antitrypanosomal therapy in patients with chronic Chagas disease. We searched Ovid Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Global Health, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane Library, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Virtual Health Library databases from inception to May 18, 2024. We included aggregated data from randomized controlled studies and observational reports (full articles and abstracts) featuring antiparasitic interventions with benznidazole or nifurtimox compared to a control group. Primary outcomes were electrocardiogram (ECG) changes, disease progression, cardiovascular death, and overall mortality. A customized risk of bias scale assessed the methodological quality of studies, and a random-effects model estimated the pooled risk ratios. This investigation was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023495755). Findings Out of 4666 reports screened, 23 met the pre-specified inclusion criteria (8972 participants). Compared…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 8,972 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free