Evidence Hub

Global health initiatives and mycetoma management: the unmet promise

Ahmed Hassan Fahal, Dallas J. Smith, Ali Awadallah Saeed, Borna A. Nyaoke, Fabiana Piovesan Alves, Kingsley Bampoe Asiedu, Roderick J. Hay

Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2025

Abstract

Global health initiatives have undeniably fuelled substantial progress in combating many neglected tropical diseases (NTDs). These efforts have been largely facilitated by international partnerships, collaborative funding and targeted programmes (frequently involving mass drug administration [MDA]) that have brought visibility and resources to diseases that are targeted for elimination like lymphatic filariasis, trachoma and onchocerciasis, with 49 countries having eliminated at least one NTD. Through programmes aligned with the WHO, governments, non-profit and pharmaceutical companies, millions have benefited from prevention and treatment efforts, underscoring the impact of focused health interventions. However, these success stories reveal critical disparities, for example, diseases and conditions amenable to case management such as lymphoedema and hydrocele from lymphatic filariasis and mycetoma. In this article, we focus on the challenges of mycetoma, a debilitating NTD that remains conspicuously underserved. The case of mycetoma underscores significant gaps in the failed commitments of global health and highlights how these initiatives have often fallen short of the stated goals to address all NTDs comprehensively within the framework of Universal Health Coverage and Sustainable Development. Mycetoma, a complex and chronic infection that primarily affects marginalised populations in arid tropical and subtropical regions, manifests as progressive swelling and deformity,…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free