Evidence Hub

Efficacy and Safety of SGLT2 Inhibitors and GLP-1 Receptor Agonists on Ventricular Arrhythmias and Cardiovascular Events: A Disease-Stratified Network Meta-Analysis

Sun WT, Liu RX, Jiang YH, Zhao YK, Yi-Cai, Wu YF, Li TL, Chang PF

Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2026

140 participants

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effects of individual sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2 inhibitors) and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 receptor agonists) on ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) remain uncertain. This study aimed to comprehensively compare their effects on VAs and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or heart failure (HF).

METHODS: Four databases were systematically searched from inception through May 16, 2026, to identify randomised controlled trials. Nine outcomes were evaluated, including VAs, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure (HHF).

RESULTS: Thirty-seven publications, corresponding to 32 independent RCTs and 140 156 participants, were included. Most SGLT2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists did not significantly increase VA risk; empagliflozin showed a statistically significant but exploratory signal for lower VA risk in the T2DM network (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.11-0.86). Dapagliflozin in the HF network and empagliflozin and liraglutide in the T2DM network, were associated with lower cardiovascular and all-cause mortality. SGLT2 inhibitors consistently reduced HHF across both networks. Dapagliflozin was associated with lower AKI risk, while albiglutide and liraglutide were associated with lower hypoglycemia risk; however, these safety findings should be interpreted cautiously because adverse-event reporting was not uniform across trials. Several safety…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 140 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free