Evidence Hub

Discovery of Novel Recurrent Mutations in Childhood Early T-Cell Precursor Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia by Whole Genome Sequencing - a Report From the St Jude Children's Research Hospital - Washington University Pediatric Cancer Genome Project

Jing-Hui Zhang, L. Ding, L. Holmfeldt, Gang Wu, S. Heatley, D. Payne-Turner, J. Easton, Xiang Chen et al.

2011

12 participants · 49 citations

Abstract

Abstract 68 Early T-cell precursor acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ETP ALL) is characterized by an immature T-lineage immunophenotype (cCD3+, CD1a-, CD8- and CD5dim) aberrant expression of myeloid and stem cell markers, a distinct gene expression profile and very poor outcome. The underlying genetic basis of this form of leukemia is unknown. Here we report results of whole genome sequencing (WGS) of tumor and normal DNA from 12 children with ETP ALL. Genomes were sequenced to 30-fold haploid coverage using the Illumina GAIIx platform, and all putative somatic sequence and structural variants were validated. The frequency of mutations in 43 genes was assessed in a recurrence cohort of 52 ETP and 42 non-ETP T-ALL samples from patients enrolled in St Jude, Children9s Oncology Group and AEIOP trials. Transcriptomic resequencing was performed for two WGS cases, and whole exome sequencing for three ETP ALL cases in the recurrence cohort. We identified 44 interchromosomal translocations (mean 4 per patient, range 0–12), 32 intrachromosomal translocations (mean 3, 0–7), 53 deletions (mean 4, 0–10) and 16 insertions (mean 1, 0–5). Three cases exhibited a pattern of complex rearrangements suggestive of a single cellular catastrophe (“chromothripsis”), two of which had mutations targeting mismatch and DNA repair ( MLH3 and DCLRE1C ). While no single chromosomal alteration was present in all cases, 10 of 12 ETP ALLs harbored chromosomal rearrangements, several of which involved complex…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 12 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free