Evidence Hub

Aquablation at 4-years: Real World Data from the Largest Single-Center Study with Associated Outcomes Follow-up

Olamide O Omidele, Alexandra S. Siegal, Reza Roshandel, A. Te, Steven A Kaplan

Urology, 2024

330 participants · 11 citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To report real-world experience of 4-year safety and efficacy outcomes of Aquablation procedure for the treatment of men with symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH).

METHODS

This is a prospective single-center, observational study evaluating the outcomes of robotic-assisted Aquablation therapy for moderate-to-severe BPH between December 2019 and December 2023. Patient-level data included age, prostate volume, IPSS score, peak urinary flow rate (Qmax), post-void residual (PVR) were evaluated at 3M, 6M, and Years 1 - 4. Primary outcomes included change in IPSS score, change in Qmax, change in PVR, preservation of antegrade ejaculation, and complications.

RESULTS

In this cohort of 330 men, mean prostatic volume was 110.3 mL (range 38-330 mL) at baseline. International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) improved from a baseline of 23.8 (SD 8.4) to 6.9 (SD 2.9) at 4 years. Mean peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) also demonstrated improvement and increased from 6.4 ml/sec (SD 4.2) to 17.4 ml/sec (SD 5.5) at 4 years. At one year, mean prostate volume reduction was 45.5 mL (-41.3%). Postoperative antegrade ejaculation was preserved in 249/250 men (99.6)% of men. Complications included urinary tract infection within first month after procedure in 37 (11.2%) and bleeding requiring blood transfusion in 11 (3.3%). 13 patients (3.9%) required a second procedure including 2 for post operative bleeding, 1 for a bladder neck disruption and 10 (3.0%) for transurethral resection of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 330 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free