Evidence Hub

Efficacy of MRI/US guided fusion biopsy with transperineal approach for histological verification of clinically significant prostate cancer localized in the anterior fibromuscular stroma of the prostate

V. Todorova, O. Gatsev, Konstantin Hristov, K. Petkova, I. Saltirov

Journal of Endourology and Minimally Invasive Surgery, 2025

508 participants

Abstract

Introduction: Prostate cancer necessitates precise diagnostic methods to ensure

timely and appropriate treatment. The advancement of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), combined in real-time with ultrasound (US) via fusion technology,

has enabled enhanced targeted biopsy capabilities. Tumors located within the

anterior fibromuscular stroma have traditionally posed significant challenges

for histological verification due to limited accessibility by transrectal biopsy. The

adoption of a transperineal approach significantly improves diagnostic efficacy in

this anatomically challenging region.

Objective: The present study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of

MRI/US fusion biopsy via transperineal access in detecting clinically significant

prostate cancer localized in the anterior zone.

Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patient

data collected from January 2023 to June 2025. All patients with elevated total

prostate-specific antigen (tPSA) levels underwent MRI assessment with lesions

scored according to PI-RADS criteria. Patients presenting with lesions localized to

the anterior zone and rated PI-RADS 3 or higher underwent MRI/US fusion-guided

transperineal biopsy. Histopathological outcomes were subsequently analyzed.

Results: The cohort consisted of 508 patients, of whom 19.7% (100 patients)

demonstrated MRI-detected lesions localized in the anterior zone. The mean age

within this subgroup was 66.9 ± 9.2 years. Mean tPSA was 13.6 ± 9.1…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 508 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free