Evidence Hub

A National, Prospective, Randomized, Open Label Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of IV/PO Moxifloxacin vs IV Ceftriaxone + IV Azithromycin Followed by PO Amoxicilline/Clavulanate and PO Clarithromycin in Subjects With Community-acquired Pneumonia

ClinicalTrials.gov · COMPLETED, 2009

60 participants

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to assess if a therapy with oral and intravenous moxifloxacin is as effective as a therapy with intravenous ceftriaxone + intravenous azithromycin followed by oral amoxicilline/clavulanate and oral clarithromycin in the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia.

Conditions: Pneumonia.

Primary outcome: Clinical response 20 days after completion of study treatment (Test-of-Cure visit).

Enrollment: 60 participants.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 60 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free