Evidence Hub

Repurposed Drugs and Cardiovascular Morbidity: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Leah OM, Leah OM, Leaşu FG, Badea M, Constantinescu M, Vârciu M, Rogozea LM

American journal of therapeutics, 2026

1 citation

Abstract

Background: Cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of global mortality (19.8 million deaths in 2022; 32% of all deaths worldwide). Drug repurposing-extending approved agents beyond their original indications-has emerged as a high-impact strategy in cardiovascular prevention, offering reduced development timelines, established safety profiles, and faster implementation than de novo molecular development.

Study question: Which repurposed cardiovascular agents demonstrate the most favorable pharmacoeconomic profiles, and how does the convergence of clinical benefit, patient risk stratification, and economic sustainability define the optimal hierarchy for cardiovascular prevention?

Study design: Narrative review synthesizing evidence from 19 pivotal cardiovascular outcomes trials and European and American guidelines. No formal meta-analysis was applied.

Measures and outcomes: For 13 agents across 8 therapeutic classes, efficacy was quantified as relative and absolute risk reductions, and as the number needed to treat or to harm. Pharmacoeconomic value was assessed via incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in US dollars per quality-adjusted life year, integrating mortality in years of life lost and morbidity in years lived with disability. Primary outcomes included all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, and heart failure hospitalizations.

Results: Three Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) tiers were identified:…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free