Evidence Hub

Economic Evaluation of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors in Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved or Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction: A Systematic Review

Rezaeian M, Nasirzadeh M, Tashakori-Miyanroudi M, Rezapour A, Hghjoo M, Souresrafil A

Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran, 2025

Abstract

Background: Heart Failure (HF) is a complex and life-threatening syndrome with substantial morbidity, mortality, diminished function, and high healthcare costs. Several studies have demonstrated that sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are very promising for improving HF outcomes in patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) or mild reduction in ejection fraction (HFmrEF). A review of the cost-effectiveness of SGLT2 inhibitors for the treatment of HFpEF is essential to help clinicians and decision-makers identify the most cost-effective treatment option for HF. The purpose of this study was to review economic studies on the addition of SGLT-2i to HFpEF or HFmrEF.

Methods: In this systematic review, searches were conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases from January 2020 to March 2025. Full economic evaluations of adding SGLT-2i in HF with HFpEF or HFmrEF were included for data extraction. Articles were screened at the title, abstract, and full-text levels. The data were extracted into an Excel table, and the narrative synthesis was performed. The quality of the studies was assessed using the CHEERS 2022 criteria.

Results: A total of 421 references were screened after removing duplicates. Twenty-one studies were identified that examined full economic evaluations of adding SGLT-2i in HFpEF or HFmrEF. Most studies were from China and the USA. The highest and lowest incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year for…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free