Evidence Hub

Omadacycline for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Kong WQ, Shu YF, Tang J, Li SQ, Zhong H, Zhang XY

BMC infectious diseases, 2025

20,862 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Background: Few studies have compared the efficacy and safety of omadacycline with other treatments for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI). Therefore, updated meta-analyses on this topic is necessary.

Methods: We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to compare omadacycline with other anti-MRSA antibiotics. A systematic search of seven databases was undertaken to identify eligible RCTs enrolling adults with ABSSSI. Two reviewers independently assessed the quality of the included studies and three reviewers independently extracted data from all manuscripts. All meta-analyses were performed using R software.

Results: Our NMA included 39 RCTs with a total of 20,862 patients with ABSSSI. Eighteen anti-MRSA antibiotics were analyzed in the NMA. In terms of early clinical response, omadacycline was comparable to oxazolidinones like linezolid, tedizolid, and contezolid. Across various populations, including the intention-to-treat (ITT), modified ITT, and clinically evaluable populations, omadacycline showed higher or comparable clinical success rates, although these results were of borderline statistical significance. The results showed that omadacycline ranked first in efficacy among 18 antibiotics, based on surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. Additionally, omadacycline had significantly fewer serious adverse events than telavancin and demonstrated a safety profile comparable to other antibiotics.…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 20,862 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free