Evidence Hub

Association of SGLT2 Inhibitors with Arrhythmias and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes or Heart Failure: A Meta-Analysis of 34 Randomized Controlled Trials

Gilson Costa Fernandes, Amanda Dantas Ferreira Fernandes, Rhanderson N. Cardoso, Jorge Peñalver, Leonardo Knijnik, Raul David Mitrani, Robert J. Myerburg, Jeffrey J. Goldberger

Heart Rhythm, 2021

63,166 participants · 226 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) reduce hospitalizations and death from heart failure (HF), but their effect on arrhythmia expression has been poorly investigated.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of SGLT2i with arrhythmias in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) or HF.

METHODS

We searched Pubmed and ClinicalTrials.gov. Two independent investigators identified randomized, double-blind trials that compared SGLT2i with placebo or active control for adults with T2DM or HF. Primary outcomes were incident atrial arrhythmias, ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD).

RESULTS

We included 34 randomized (25 placebo-controlled and 9 active-controlled) trials with 63,166 patients (35,883 SGLT2i vs 27,273 control - mean age 53-67 years, 63% male). Medications included canagliflozin, dapagliflozin, empagliflozin or ertugliflozin. Except for one study on HF, all patients had T2DM. Follow-up ranged from 24 weeks to 5.7 years. The cumulative incidence of events was low - 3.6, 1.4 and 2.5 per 1,000 patient-years for atrial arrhythmias, VA and SCD, respectively. SGLT2i therapy was associated with a significant reduction in risk of incident atrial arrhythmias (OR, 0.81, 95% CI 0.69-0.95; P=0.008) and the "SCD" component of the SCD outcome (OR, 0.72, 95% CI 0.54-0.97; P=0.03) compared with control. There was no significant difference in incident VA or the "cardiac arrest" SCD component between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2i are…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 63,166 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free