Evidence Hub

Anti-interferon-γ autoantibodies syndrome and opportunistic infections: systematic literature review

Chen N, Hong L, Liang H, Yu Q, Liang S, He Z

Frontiers in immunology, 2025

1,430 participants · 7 citations

Abstract

Introduction: Anti-interferon-γ autoantibodies (AIGAs) syndrome is a rare, adult-onset immunodeficiency characterized by increased susceptibility to various opportunistic infections. Currently, there are no standardized diagnostic or therapeutic guidelines for AIGAs syndrome, making clinical management challenging.

Goals: To summarize and synthesize the published literature on the demographic characteristics, infection types, affected organs, treatments, and outcomes of AIGAs syndrome. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of current knowledge regarding the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatment of AIGAs syndrome.

Methods: We searched PubMed, EMBASE for publications in English between January 1, 2004, and March 8, 2025 relating to AIGAs syndrome. Data from eligible studies were extracted and synthesized to summarize demographic characteristics, infection types, affected organs, treatments, and outcomes.

Results: A total of 149 eligible studies, encompassing 1430 patients (664 males [46.43%], 672 females [46.99%], and 94 with unmentioned gender), were included. Patients frequently presented with two or more opportunistic infections, most commonly non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM, 55.69%), Talaromyces marneffei (TM, 26.98%), Salmonella spp. (12.43%), Mycobacterium tuberculosis (9.34%), and varicella-zoster virus (VZV, 9.57%). Multi-organ involvement was common, particularly affecting lymph nodes (70.24%), lungs (58.75%),…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a systematic review, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,430 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free