Evidence Hub

Effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors on cardiac remodelling: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Nan Zhang, Yueying Wang, Gary Tse, Panagiotis G. Korantzopoulos, Κonstantinos P. Letsas, Qingpeng Zhang, Guangping Li, Gregory Y.H. Lip et al.

European Journal of Preventive Cardiology, 2021

1,251 participants · 80 citations

Abstract

AIMS: To examine the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on cardiac remodelling in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and/or heart failure (HF), and to explore the subsets of patients who may have greater benefit from SGLT2i therapy. METHODS AND RESULTS: Four electronic databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated the effects of SGLT2i on parameters reflecting cardiac remodelling in patients with T2DM and/or HF. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) or mean differences (MDs) were pooled. Subgroup analyses were performed according to the baseline HF and T2DM, HF type, SGLT2i agent, follow-up duration, and imaging modality. A total of 13 RCTs involving 1251 patients were analysed. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors treatment significantly improved left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction [SMD, 0.35; 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.04, 0.65); P = 0.03], LV mass [SMD, -0.48; 95% CI (-0.79, -0.18); P = 0.002], LV mass index [SMD, -0.27; 95% CI (-0.49, -0.05); P = 0.02], LV end-systolic volume [SMD, -0.37; 95% CI (-0.71; -0.04); P = 0.03], LV end-systolic volume index [MD, -0.35 mL/m2; 95% CI (-0.64, -0.05); P = 0.02], and E-wave deceleration time [SMD, -0.37; 95% CI (-0.70, -0.05); P = 0.02] in the overall population. Subgroup analyses showed that the favourable effects of SGLT2i on LV remodelling were only significant in HF patients, especially HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), regardless of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 1,251 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free