Evidence Hub

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and fracture risk in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic literature review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Md Azharuddin, Mohammad Adil, Pinaki Ghosh, Manju Sharma

Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 2018

32,343 participants · 44 citations

Abstract

AIM: To perform a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to estimate effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on fracture risk in patients with T2DM.

METHODS: A systematic search was performed on PubMed/Medline and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to May 2018 to identify RCTs reporting fracture events with the use of SGLT2 inhibitors compared to control group in patients with T2DM. NMA within a Bayesian framework was performed to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) using random effect model. Node splitting method was applied to evaluate the presence of inconsistency for NMA.

RESULTS: A total of 40 RCTs including 32,343 T2DM patients with 466 fracture cases. Pairwise meta-analysis showed no association between risk of fracture and SGLT2 inhibitors use (OR = 1.01, 95%CI 0.83-1.23; p = 0.91; I2 = 27%) compared with the control group. The NMA has shown a non-significant association with fracture risk and canagliflozin (OR = 0.57, 95%CrI 0.12-1.90), dapagliflozin (OR = 0.58, 95%CrI 0.13-2.00), and empagliflozin (OR = 0.78, 95%CrI 0.23-2.80) use when compared to placebo. No association was also found among SGLT-2 inhibitors (canagliflozin OR = 2.6, 95%CrI 0.69-16.00; dapagliflozin OR = 2.6, 95%CrI 0.52-22.00; and empagliflozin OR = 3.7, 95% CrI 1.0-27.00), when compared to active treatment. Node-splitting analysis shows non-significant inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons.

CONCLUSION: The…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 32,343 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free