Evidence Hub

Omadacycline versus moxifloxacin for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (OPTIC-2): a phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, controlled, noninferiority trial

T. File, K. S. Kaye, S. Ihor, I. Hovbakh, V. Katsarava, C. Kirsch, K. Soni, K. Gupta et al.

EClinicalMedicine, 2025

670 participants · 3 citations

Abstract

Summary Background Omadacycline is a first-in-class aminomethylcycline antibiotic approved to treat adults with community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP). This trial was conducted as a postmarketing regulatory commitment to confirm the efficacy and safety of omadacycline. Methods This phase 3b, randomised, double-blind, multicentre, noninferiority trial enrolled adults in Eastern Europe between February 2021 (first patient enrolled) and March 2024 (last patient follow-up visit) who had CABP (NCT04779242). Participants with Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI) class III or IV CABP were randomised 1:1 to omadacycline (100 mg IV every 12 h for two doses, then 100 mg IV QD) or moxifloxacin (400 mg IV QD), with an oral option after ≥2 days of treatment (omadacycline, 300 mg QD; or moxifloxacin, 400 mg QD), for a total of 7–10 days. Primary efficacy endpoint was early clinical response (ECR), assessed 72–120 h after first dose, with a noninferiority margin of 10%. Key secondary endpoint was investigator's assessment of clinical response at post-therapy evaluation (PTE), 5–10 days after last dose. Microbiological response was determined by subject and pathogen. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported through 30–37 days after first dose. Findings Of 670 participants randomised (omadacycline, n = 336; moxifloxacin, n = 334), approximately half were aged >65 years, and 76% had PSI class III disease. Omadacycline was noninferior to moxifloxacin at ECR and PTE (ECR, 89.6%…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 670 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free