Evidence Hub

Cost-effectiveness of omadacycline versus moxifloxacin as the initial treatment for community-acquired bacterial pneumonia in China

Xiuling Wang, Yao Fu, Guijun Duan, Wenqian Kong

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: Community-acquired bacterial pneumonia (CABP) remains a leading cause of hospitalization, morbidity, and mortality worldwide, with substantial clinical and economic burdens. Effective initial antibiotic therapy is critical to optimize patient outcomes and reduce healthcare costs. Omadacycline, a novel aminomethylcycline with broad-spectrum antibacterial activity and favorable pharmacokinetics, has been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of CABP. Clinical studies have shown that omadacycline is non-inferior to moxifloxacin, a widely used respiratory fluoroquinolone, in terms of efficacy. However, the higher acquisition cost of omadacycline raises questions regarding its economic value, particularly in resource-limited healthcare systems such as China. Given the increasing emphasis on cost-effectiveness to guide formulary decisions, evaluating the economic viability of omadacycline relative to moxifloxacin is essential. Aim This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of omadacycline versus moxifloxacin as initial treatment for CABP in China. Method A decision-tree model was constructed using TreeAge Pro 2020 to assess sequential intravenous (IV)-to-oral omadacycline versus moxifloxacin in adult patients with non-severe CABP. Parameter values were obtained from published literature, public databases, and clinician surveys. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated, and sensitivity analyses were…

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free