Evidence Hub

Improvements of myocardial strain and work in diabetes patients with normal ejection fraction after empagliflozin treatment

Cheng X, Huang P, Liu H, Bi X, Gao Y, Lu R, Gao Y, Liu Y et al.

Journal of diabetes investigation, 2024

128 participants · 6 citations

Abstract

AIMS/INTRODUCTION: To assess the effect of empagliflozin treatment on left ventricular (LV), right ventricular (RV) and left atrial (LA) functions in diabetes patients with normal ejection fraction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included a total of 128 diabetes patients with multiple cardiovascular risk factors who were subjected to a 6-month follow up from the initiation of empagliflozin treatment. Before and after treatment with empagliflozin, LV, RV and LA strain, and noninvasive myocardial work parameters were evaluated by speckle tracking echocardiography.

RESULTS: In 128 diabetes patients (mean age 56 ± 8 years, 85 men) with multiple cardiovascular risk factors, myocardial strain and work parameters were impaired, despite the absence of significant clinical symptoms of heart failure. After 6-month treatment with empagliflozin, the absolute value of LV strain in all directions increased, represented by LV global longitudinal strain (-18.0 ± 1.7% to -19.2 ± 1.7% [mean ± SD]). The same trend in LV global work efficiency (93 [91-94] % to 94 [93-95] % [median (IQR)]), RV free-wall longitudinal strain (-24.0 ± 2.7% to -25.0 ± 2.8%), LA reservoir (31 ± 5% to 34 ± 5%) and conduit strain (-14 ± 4% to -16 ± 4%) was also observed. LV mass index (106.9 ± 16.8-103.6 ± 16.4 g/m2) and LV global wasted work (143 [111-185] mmHg% to 108 [88-141] mmHg%) decreased after treatment (P < 0.05 for all). LV volume and LA volume index remained unchanged after treatment. In the multivariable…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 128 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free