Evidence Hub

Factors influencing the efficacy of nebulized colistimethate sodium in the treatment of severe lung infection caused by carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria

Fu Y, Li R, Mu G, Cheng C, Zhao M, Gu Y, Zhang C, Tao Y et al.

International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases, 2026

314 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nebulized colistimethate sodium (CMS) can help treat carbapenem-resistant gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) infection. However, it remains unclear how various patient-related factors affect its efficacy.

METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter retrospective study involving 24 hospitals in China. Patients diagnosed with severe pneumonia caused by CR-GNB and who received nebulized CMS 75 mg every 12 h for at least 3 days were included. Logistic regression was performed to examine associations with clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 314 patients were included, with an average age of 68.9 years, and 77.4% were male. Most patients (89.2%) had no history of CR-GNB infection. Pathogens exhibited resistance to imipenem (90.4%), meropenem (90.1%), and ampicillin/sulbactam (82.5%). Following treatment, the cohort achieved 76.1% microbiological efficacy and 79.3% overall clinical response rate. The mortality rate was 20.1%. Multivariable analysis revealed that age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92-0.997, P = 0.04), history of stroke (aOR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.77, P = 0.02), and combination treatment with tigecycline (aOR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.22-0.50; P = 0.004) were independently associated with lower bacterial clearance. Use of moxifloxacin before CMS administration (aOR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.02-0.55; P = 0.007) and tigecycline treatment (aOR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.06-0.58; P = 0.003) were associated with a lower clinical response. After…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 314 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free