Evidence Hub

Antibiotics guided by metagenomic next-generation sequencing to control infection after total knee arthroplasty: A case report and literature review

Hao Mei, Jie Mei, Yunxin Sun, Qiang Shang, Peilei Sun, Yu-Bao Yang, Jin-Qing Kan, Xiaobing Chen et al.

Medicine, 2025

Abstract

Rationale: A prosthetic joint infection is a serious complication of joint surgery, with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common pathogen. In contrast, C. burnetii, the agent of Q fever, is a rare zoonotic parasite primarily found in cattle and sheep. It can be transmitted through respiratory, digestive, and cutaneous routes, destroying host cells and leading to diseases such as bone and joint infections, endocarditis, and interstitial lung disease. Patient concerns: A 75-year-old male patient underwent total knee arthroplasty due to degenerative disease in his left knee. After surgery, he was exposed to cattle and their feces. Fifteen months after the operation, he experienced pain, though there was no significant elevation of erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP) and white blood cell (WBC). Oral nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were administered. The pain intensified and was accompanied by swelling. ESR and CRP were elevated, while WBC remained normal. The patient took oral Rifampicin for 28 days without improvement. The knee joint puncture culture was negative. The metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) detected C. burnetii, and oral Doxycycline for 1 week. The intravenous infusion of Doxycycline and Moxifloxacin continued for 28 days. After the above indexes stabilized, a 1-stage revision surgery was performed, and Doxycycline and Moxifloxacin were administered for 16 days until the indexes returned to normal and symptoms…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free