Evidence Hub

Community-Acquired Chlamydia psittaci Severe Pneumonia: A Case Report

Quentin Guillemot, Thomas Clemens, Valentine Inthasot, B. Mahadeb, E. Maillart, P. Clevenbergh

Case Reports in Infectious Diseases, 2025

1 citation

Abstract

Chlamydia psittaci , the causative agent of psittacosis, is an intracellular bacterium typically transmitted from birds to humans, leading to atypical pneumonia. We present a case of a 60‐year‐old man with no reported bird exposure but a history of working as a chief cook, potentially exposed to poultry. He presented with high fever, diffuse soreness, and left‐sided pulmonary consolidation. Initial treatment with β‐lactams was ineffective, but a multiplex PCR on bronchoalveolar lavage identified C. psittaci DNA. Therapy was switched to moxifloxacin, resulting in rapid clinical improvement. C. psittaci causes approximately 1% of community‐acquired pneumonias, often underdiagnosed due to nonspecific symptoms and the need for advanced diagnostic tools like nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs) or metagenomic next‐generation sequencing (mNGS). The bacterium is endemic in birds and poultry, with human infections linked to occupational exposure or contact with infected animals. Diagnosis relies on NAAT and mNGS, as serology and culture are less practical. Treatment with tetracyclines, quinolones, or macrolides is effective, reducing mortality from 10%–20% to < 1%. Preventive measures, including protective equipment for high‐risk individuals and treatment of infected birds, are crucial. Mandatory reporting of cases could improve understanding of the disease burden. This case highlights the importance of considering psittacosis in atypical pneumonia, even without direct bird…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free