Evidence Hub

Case Report: Severe Neonatal Legionella pneumophila Pneumonia: Insights from Clinical Management and Epidemiological Investigation

Mohammed Abdullah Al Qasem, Ahmed Sayed Esawy, Ibrahim Ahmed Al Zaydani Asiri, Faya Mohammed Ali Alasiri, Mufareh Asiri, Ahmed Abdoh Aljarie, Ahmad Ali Alzoani

International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2025

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Legionella pneumophila is a rare but potentially fatal pathogen in neonates.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a critically ill three-week-old full-term male infant admitted to a Saudi tertiary hospital on March 9, 2024, with severe pneumonia and sepsis. The diagnosis was confirmed using the QIAstat-Dx Respiratory SARS-CoV-2 Panel (QIAGEN, Germany), which detected L. pneumophila via multiplex PCR. The specimen tested was an endotracheal aspirate collected through closed suction.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

The patient required high-frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV), intensive supportive therapy, and a 21-day course of targeted intravenous moxifloxacin, rifampin, and cefotaxime. Despite liver enzyme elevation likely secondary to sepsis and cardiovascular anomalies, the infant made a full recovery. This case underscores the significance of utilizing the PCR technique to diagnose rare and severe respiratory infections in neonates.

EPIDEMIOLOGICAL INVESTIGATION

An extensive investigation, including water system sampling, revealed no additional cases, classifying the incident as isolated. Environmental assessments underscored the importance of robust water safety management, surveillance, and prevention strategies to mitigate neonatal Legionella risk.

CONCLUSION

This case underscores the value of syndromic PCR diagnostics, rapid intervention, and vigilant environmental surveillance in neonatal infection control. National and international water safety plans must maintain…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free