Evidence Hub

Pneumonia with BALF Detection of Tropheryma whipplei and Chlamydia psittaci by Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing: A Case Report

Li X, Feng Q

Infection and drug resistance, 2026

Abstract

Background: Tropheryma whipplei (TW) , a Gram-positive bacterium, is the etiologic agent of Whipple’s disease, a chronic and systemic condition that primarily involves the gastrointestinal tract. Chlamydia psittaci (C. psittaci) is a zoonotic pathogen that primarily leads to psittacosis after bird exposure. Both are fastidious organisms that are difficult to culture, and documented co-detection in pulmonary infection is relatively rare. We describe a pneumonia case in which both TW and C. psittaci were identified by targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS). Case Presentation: A 69-year-old male farmer presented with a 5-day history of high fever. After a 3-day course of oseltamivir for presumed influenza failed, he was hospitalized with persistent fever. Chest computed tomography (CT) showed patchy opacities with pleural thickening. Initial moxifloxacin therapy was ineffective. The tNGS of bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) detected TW and C. psittaci . Antibacterial therapy was switched to intravenous ceftriaxone combined with oral doxycycline. The patient’s fever subsided rapidly, inflammatory markers declined, and subsequent CT scans over six months demonstrated progressive radiographic resolution. Conclusion: This case illustrates that tNGS can provide early detection of fastidious pathogens such as TW and C. psittaci when conventional testing is unrevealing, thereby guiding targeted antimicrobial therapy and contributing to a favorable clinical outcome. A causal role…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free