Evidence Hub

Concurrent Pulmonary Detection of Nocardia beijingensis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Mycobacterium fortuitum in a Liver Transplant Recipient

Membreno A, Martinez A, Bilenkin A, Saugar EE, Del Pilar Bonilla L, Porras A

Journal of Brown hospital medicine, 2026

Abstract

A 66-year-old Chinese man with chronic hepatitis B treated with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, a history of liver transplantation approximately 17 months earlier, hypertension, and atrial fibrillation treated with apixaban presented with progressive weakness, weight loss, and inability to ambulate. His only anti-rejection agent was tacrolimus. One month earlier, he had been hospitalized for multifocal pneumonia and treated with intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam for seven days after outpatient cefdinir failed. He was discharged without antibiotics. Bronchoscopy showed no endobronchial lesions or mucosal abnormalities. The initial routine microbiologic results were negative, but mycobacterial cultures remained in prolonged incubation. After discharge but before his subsequent readmission, a sputum culture from the prior hospitalization identified Mycobacterium fortuitum. On readmission, he had profound hyponatremia with a serum sodium concentration of 105 mmol/L, requiring intensive care and hypertonic saline. Imaging showed progressive right upper lobe consolidation concerning for infection or malignancy. Several days into the readmission, a biopsy of a technically accessible right lower lobe nodule showed inflammation without malignancy or caseating granulomas. Shortly thereafter, a bronchoalveolar lavage culture obtained during the prior hospitalization identified Mycobacterium tuberculosis after prolonged incubation. Tissue culture from the lung biopsy later identified…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free