Evidence Hub

Walking the tightrope: Mixed respiratory failure exacerbated by heart rate control and concurrent pneumonia in an elderly patient with new-onset atrial fibrillation: A case report

Huang Y, Huang H, Yan H, Zhang X, Wang F, Chen Y, Deng Z, Yang X

Medicine, 2026

Abstract

Rationale: The interplay between new-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), and acute infection in the elderly presents a complex clinical challenge. Rate control is a cornerstone of AF management, but its application in frail patients with limited cardiac reserve and concurrent infection remains uncertain. This case illustrates the diagnostic and therapeutic difficulties encountered when these conditions converge, highlighting the need for dynamic assessment and individualized treatment strategies.

Patient concerns: An 86-year-old woman with a history of hypertension, HFpEF, and cerebral infarction presented with a 3-day history of worsening dizziness and dyspnea. On admission, she was afebrile with clear lung auscultation but had a rapid, irregular heart rate of 152 bpm.

Diagnoses: Electrocardiogram confirmed new-onset AF with rapid ventricular response. Elevated N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide confirmed acute HF exacerbation. Although an initial chest computed tomography showed only minor chronic changes, the patient subsequently developed fever, productive cough, and hypoxemia. A repeat chest computed tomography revealed new multifocal pulmonary infiltrates and bilateral pleural effusions. Sputum culture later confirmed Klebsiella pneumoniae infection. The final diagnosis was mixed respiratory failure exacerbated by rapid AF in a patient with underlying HFpEF.

Interventions: Initial treatment included…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free