Evidence Hub

Enterococcus faecium pneumonia diagnosed by metagenomic next-generation sequencing in a patient with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Li L, Wang D, Huang C

IDCases, 2026

Abstract

Enterococcus faecium is a rare pathogen in community-acquired pneumonia (CAP), and its diagnosis is challenging, particularly when prior antibiotic therapy hampers isolation by conventional culture. We report a 72-year-old man with a 6-year history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who presented with fever, cough, and progressive dyspnea. Despite empirical broad-spectrum antibiotics (piperacillin-tazobactam followed by imipenem-cilastatin), his condition deteriorated into acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. All routine cultures of blood, sputum, and throat swabs were negative, and extensive atypical pathogen screening was unrevealing. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) of sputum and subsequently bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid, performed at the ISO 15189-accredited central laboratory of Qujing Central Hospital of Yunnan Province, detected high read counts of E. faecium (sputum: 22,710 reads; BAL: 7921 reads; opportunistic pathogen, classification B), with simultaneous routine screening for 31 resistance genes, 4 resistance loci, and virulence genes, all negative. Additionally, sputum mNGS detected Epstein-Barr virus (Human gammaherpesvirus 4, 6715 reads, normal microbiota, classification C), and BAL fluid mNGS detected HSV-1 (Human alphaherpesvirus 1, 407 reads, normal microbiota, classification C). Both herpesviruses had classification C and were interpreted as non-pathogenic "bystanders"; no…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free