Evidence Hub

Acute bilateral optic/chiasm neuritis with longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis and positive anti-ganglioside antibodies following mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia: a case report and literature review

Zhao J, Jia N, Zhao J, Wang J, Zhu L

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2025

2 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We present a case of a patient diagnosed with optic neuritis (ON) and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) following Mycoplasma pneumoniae (M.pneumoniae) pneumonia.

METHODS: A 60-year-old male, 16 days post-M.pneumoniae pneumonia, was evaluated for vision loss-no light perception in the right eye and perceiving only finger movements at a distance of 20 cm in the left. He also exhibited paraparesis, absent tendon reflexes in the lower limbs, urinary incontinence, and sensory deficits below the left L1 and right T10 dermatomes. Clinical data were collected, followed by a literature review of case reports from the 1990s to the present.

RESULTS: Serum testing showed positive IgG antibodies against GM1 and GD1b, while cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was negative for these antibodies. CSF analysis indicated mild pleocytosis and slight protein elevation, with negative PCR for M.pneumoniae. Cranial MRI identified contrast-enhanced lesions in the left occipital lobe, the optic nerve, optic chiasm, and adjacent tracts, while spinal MRI revealed multiple intramedullary lesions at C2-C4, T4-T7, and T10-T11 levels. Nerve conduction studies were normal. The patient received treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin, corticosteroids, and moxifloxacin, leading to a significant improvement in myelitic symptoms and partial recovery of visual function. The literature review indicated ten cases of isolated ON, nineteen with isolated acute myelitis, and five with concomitant…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free