Evidence Hub

Prevalence and serotype distribution of nasopharyngeal carriage of Streptococcus pneumoniae in Vietnam: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Xuanchen Tao, Ketaki Sharma, Catherine L. King, Toàn Trọng Nguyễn, Thu Anh Nguyen, Huyen Thi Thanh Dang, Linh Thuy Duong, Thị Huỳnh Mai Dương et al.

The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific, 2026

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) is a leading cause of childhood morbidity and mortality worldwide. While pneumococcal conjugate vaccines (PCVs) have significantly reduced the global burden of pneumococcal disease, Vietnam has yet to introduce PCV into their National Immunisation Program. Better understanding of pneumococcal disease in Vietnamese children is key to informing vaccination policy, including PCV product selection. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, serotype distribution, and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of nasopharyngeal carriage of S. pneumoniae among children in Vietnam.

METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of S. pneumoniae carriage studies in Vietnamese children under 18 years of age. Seven international biomedical research databases and 13 key Vietnamese-language journals were searched without language or publication date restrictions. The Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools were used to assess the quality of articles. We extracted data on the prevalence of S. pneumoniae carriage and the serotype distribution. Where available, we also extracted the proportions of isolates that were non-susceptible to selected antibiotics. The pooled prevalence, serotype distribution, and antibiotic resistance rates were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random-effects models.

FINDINGS: A total of 1197 studies were searched, of which 594 unique studies were identified and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free