Evidence Hub

The SGLT2 Inhibitor Empagliflozin Ameliorates the Inflammatory Profile in Type 2 Diabetic Patients and Promotes an Antioxidant Response in Leukocytes

Francesca Iannantuoni, A Marañón, Noelia Díaz‐Morales, Rosa Falcón, Celia Bañuls, Zaida Abad‐Jiménez, Víctor M. Víctor, Antonio Hernández‐Mijares et al.

Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2019

166 citations

Abstract

Sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (iSGLT2) have been linked to a considerable reduction in cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the precise molecular mechanisms are still elusive. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the iSGLT2 empagliflozin on systemic inflammation and its potential antioxidant properties. This is an observational, prospective follow-up study of a cohort of fifteen patients with T2D who received 10 mg/day of empagliflozin according to standard clinical care. Measures at baseline, 12 and 24 weeks were taken. Metabolic and anthropometric parameters were evaluated. Production of mitochondrial superoxide, glutathione content, and glutathione s-reductase and catalase mRNA levels were measured in leukocytes. Serum levels of myeloperoxidase, hs-CRP and IL-10 were determined. In addition to decreased body weight and reduced glucose and HbA1c levels, we observed a reduction in superoxide production in leukocytes of diabetic patients and increased glutathione content, prominently after 24 weeks of empagliflozin treatment. Leukocyte expression of glutathione s-reductase and catalase, and serum levels of IL-10 were enhanced at 24 weeks of empagliflozin treatment. Concomitantly, reduced hs-CRP and myeloperoxidase levels were seen. This study provides evidence of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of empagliflozin treatment in humans, which may contribute to its beneficial cardiovascular effects.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free