Evidence Hub

Design, Synthesis, and Antimicrobial Evaluation of Quinolones Containing 1,2,3-Triazole Moieties: In Silico Docking Techniques

G. Venkanna, A. Rao, K. S. Kumar, M. Prasad, C. Kalyani, G. S. Kumar, V. Srinivas

Russian journal of bioorganic chemistry, 2024

5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Objective: We have been studying the synthesis and biological activity of compounds that simultaneously comprise different heterocycles, like 1,2,3-triazoles and fused 2-quinolones, as part of our ongoing research in organic and medicinal chemistry. Methods: Using 6-methoxy-1-methyl-4-(prop-2-yn-1-yloxy)quinolin-2(1H)-one and various aryl azides, we developed and synthesized a number of novel quinolones linked 1,2,3-triazoles. The structures of the newly synthesized derivatives are characterized from IR, 1H NMR, 13C NMR, and mass analysis. The prepared derivatives were screened their in vitro antibacterial activity against S. Epidermidis, S. aureus, S. Pneumonia, P. Aeruginosa and antifungal activity against A. niger and C. albicans. Results and Discussions: Among all the synthesized compounds, 6-methoxy-1-methyl-4-((1-(pyridin-3-yl)-1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methoxy)quinolin-2(1H)-one have shown potent antibacterial activity against S. Epidermidis, S. aureus, and S. Pneumonia as compared to standard Moxifloxacin with MIC values 2.38 ± 0.01, 3.32 ± 0.04, and 2.52 ± 0.01 µg/mL. Similarly, antifungal activity of newly synthesized derivatives same compound has shown more potent activity against A. niger and C. albicans fungal strains with MIC values 2.67 ± 0.01 and 2.70 ± 0.01 µg/mL. In silico molecular docking results of more potent compounds were shown comparable binding energies. Finally, the in silico pharmacokinetic profile of all the synthesized derivatives were…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a simulation / modelling, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free