Evidence Hub

New Quinazolinone‐Tethered 1,2,3‐Triazoles aSs Potent Antimicrobial Agents: Design, Synthesis, Biological Evaluation and in silico Docking Study

Jeevan Lal Patel, Naveen Kumar Sureddy, Raju Chedupaka, Papisetti Venkatesham, Shyama Prasad Mahapatra, Santhosh Penta

ChemistrySelect, 2024

5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Novel 1,2,3‐triazole acetamide linked quinazolinone derivatives were synthesized via click reaction, by reacting of 3‐methyl‐2‐(prop‐2‐yn‐1‐ylthio)quinazolin‐4(3 H )‐one with various aryl azides as prominent fungal pathogen Candida albicans interactions. The prepared triazole compounds were characterized using mass spectrometry, 1 H NMR, 13 C NMR, and IR spectroscopic techniques. Compounds were screened for their in vitro antibacterial and antifungal activity against a variety of microorganisms namely, Bacillus subtilis, Enterococcus faecalis, Klebsiella pneumonia, Escherichia coli, Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans , and Aspergillus clavatus . Quinazolinone linked p ‐hydroxyphenyl, o , p ‐dihydroxyphenyl and o ‐dimethylamino phenyl triazoles showed a remarkable antibacterial activity against E. faecalis with MIC values of 3.20±0.01, 4.01±0.04, and 4.10±0.01 μg mL −1 , and screened compounds p ‐nitrophenyl substituted triazole, and p ‐methylphenyl substituted triazole displayed a significant antifungal activity against C. albicans with MICs of 3.16±0.01, 4.06±0.03 μg mL −1 , compared to itraconazole (MIC=3.32±0.02 μg mL −1 ). For further exploration of the anti‐fungal mechanism of action, molecular docking was carried out for these compounds in C. albicans active site as one of the important antifungal inhibitors (PDB: 1A19). Furthermore, the ADMET profile was evaluated for all the final triazole compounds in contrast to reference drugs moxifloxacin and…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a experimental / empirical study, done in computer models (in silico), not in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free