Evidence Hub

Update on the Efficacy and Safety of Sodium-Glucose Co-Transporter 2 Inhibitors in Patients with Chronic Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Liang IC, Chang HH, Lai YJ, Chan CM, Sung CH, Pu CM, Chang DC, Ho CC et al.

Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025

90,413 participants · 24 citations

Abstract

Background: Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have emerged as vital medications for the management of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Numerous studies have highlighted the cardioprotective and renal protective benefits of SGLT2 inhibitors. Consequently, it is essential to assess their efficacy and safety in patients with chronic diseases. Method: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on major cardiovascular and safety outcomes in patients with T2DM, heart failure (HF), and chronic kidney disease (CKD). We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for trials published between 30 September 2021 and 17 May 2023. The primary outcomes of interest included nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for heart failure (HHF), cardiovascular death, and nonfatal stroke. The safety outcomes assessed were hypoglycemia, urinary tract infections (UTIs), and acute kidney injury (AKI). Result: We identified 13 RCTs involving 90,413 participants. In patients with T2DM, SGLT2 inhibitors significantly reduced the risk of nonfatal MI by 12% (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.78-0.98), HHF by 33% (HR = 0.67, 95% CI: 0.62-0.74), and cardiac death by 15% (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.80-1.13). However, they did not significantly reduce the risk of nonfatal stroke (HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.75-0.95). In patients with HF, SGLT2 inhibitors reduced the risk of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 90,413 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free