Evidence Hub

Q Fever pneumonia: are clarithromycin and moxifloxacin alternative treatments only?

Morovic M

The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2005

77 participants · 17 citations

Abstract

Medical records of 77 patients with Q fever pneumonia that was serologically confirmed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were studied to compare the clinical efficacy of doxycycline, clarithromycin, and moxifloxacin. The mean times to defervescence were 2.4 days for those receiving doxycycline, 1.9 days for those receiving clarithromycin, and 2.2 days for those receiving moxifloxacin. There were no interruptions of the regimens in any groups because of side effects, and outcome was favorable in all patients with no complications or relapses during follow-up. This efficacy of clarithromycin and moxifloxacin, together with their safety profiles, suggest that these alternative agents in the treatment of Q fever pneumonia could also be used as the first-line therapy.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a clinical trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence. Reported size: 77 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free