Evidence Hub

Community-acquired Escherichia coli pneumonia: clinical, radiological, laboratory, and prognostic characteristics in a retrospective single-center study

Kücük S, Mutlu S, Dogan C, Soydan S

Annals of Saudi medicine, 2026

Abstract

Background: Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) caused by Escherichia coli (E. coli) is uncommon, and its clinical features and prognosis remain insufficiently characterized.

Objectives: To compare the clinical, laboratory, radiological, and prognostic characteristics of community-acquired E. coli pneumonia (CAECP) with CAP caused by other pathogens.

Design: Single-center retrospective observational cohort study.

Settings: Department of Pulmonology, Kocaeli City Hospital, İzmit, Kocaeli, Türkiye from April 2023 to March 2025.

Patients and methods: Adult patients hospitalized with CAP and positive sputum cultures were reviewed. Hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonias were excluded. Patients were classified as CAECP or Other-CAP. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, radiological, CURB-65, Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), and outcome data were compared. A targeted multivariable logistic regression model adjusted for age and malignancy evaluated 90-day mortality.

Main outcome measures: In-hospital mortality, 90-day mortality, intensive care unit admission, and hospital length of stay.

Sample size: Sixty-eight patients (37 CAECP, 31 Other-CAP).

Results: Median age (69 [interquartile range, IQR 50.7-71] vs 67 [56-70] years; P=.805), sex distribution (P=.452), comorbidity burden (P=.094), body temperature (P=.970), heart rate (P=.592), C-reactive protein (P=.731), procalcitonin (P=.749), multilobar involvement (P=.246), and air bronchogram (P=.938) were comparable…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a cohort study, done in people. Its evidence level is 3 of 5 (Moderate · trial / cohort / secondary analysis). Trials without a large randomized design, cohorts and secondary analyses give moderate evidence.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free