Evidence Hub

Diagnosis and management of acute eosinophilic pneumonia masquerading as malignancy and community-acquired pneumonia in an elderly male: a case report

Zhao X, Wang L, Li X, Yang Y, Shen S, Li Y, Di W, Zhang Z et al.

AME case reports, 2026

Abstract

Background: Acute eosinophilic pneumonia (AEP) is a rare disorder characterized by febrile illness, diffuse pulmonary infiltrates, and pulmonary eosinophilia. Diagnosis is challenging, especially in elderly patients, where atypical presentations can mimic community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) or even lung malignancy. Here we report a case of AEP in an elderly male with multiple comorbidities, highlighting the diagnostic dilemma and the critical role of a multidisciplinary team (MDT) approach.

Case description: A 75-year-old male patient with a history of hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cerebral infarction presented with a two-week history of intermittent fever and non-productive cough. Initial laboratory examinations at an outside hospital showed elevated white blood cell count and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), with normal eosinophil count. Prior to admission, the patient had received antipyretic agents and empirical anti-infective therapy. Initial chest computed tomography (CT) revealed bilateral pulmonary infiltrates, pleural effusion, bronchial stenosis, and marked mediastinal lymphadenopathy, which was highly suggestive of malignancy. During hospitalization, the patient was treated with cefoperazone-sulbactam (2 g every 8 hours) and moxifloxacin (0.4 g once daily) for 5 days. Although the fever resolved, the imaging abnormalities persisted. Analysis of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid showed an eosinophil percentage of 40%. A MDT consultation…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free