Evidence Hub

Newer glucose-lowering drugs reduce the risk of late-onset seizure and epilepsy: A meta-analysis

Sindhu U, Sharma A, Zawar I, Punia V

Epilepsia open, 2024

200 participants · 23 citations

Abstract

Newer glucose-lowering drugs (GLDs) protect against cerebrovascular, neurodegenerative, and neuroinflammatory pathologies. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing newer GLDs to placebo that assessed long-term cardiovascular and renal outcomes to analyze their potential to prevent late-onset seizures and epilepsy, separately and as a combined outcome. A comprehensive MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases search for DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 receptor agonists, and SGLT2 inhibitor RCTs, which reported adverse effects, including seizures and epilepsy on clinicaltrials.gov, yielded 413 studies. Of them, 27 studies with almost 200 000 patients (mean age 64.9 years, 65.6% males) were included. We calculated relative risk (RR) and odds ratio (OR) using the Mantel-Haenszel method and Peto's method. Patients taking newer GLDs had a 24% lower risk of late-onset seizures and epilepsy, combined, (RR: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.62-0.95) and 22% lower risk of late-onset seizures only (RR = 0.78; 95% CI = 0.60-1.00), compared to patients on placebo. This seizure and epilepsy prevention benefit was only noted among patients taking GLP-1 receptor agonists. Stroke incidence was comparable between newer GLDs and placebo group. GLP-1 receptor agonists like Semaglutide significantly reduce late-onset seizures and epilepsy, and their anti-epileptogenic potential in older adults needs further exploration. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Our analysis 27 clinical trials and nearly…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 200 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free