Evidence Hub

2232. A Global Phase 3 Study of Delafloxacin (DLX) Compared with Moxifloxacin (MOX) in Patients with Community-acquired Bacterial Pneumonia (CABP)

R. Salata, R. Alvarez-Sala, J. Horcajada, L. Lawrence, M. Quintas, Yang Li, S. Cammarata

Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 2019

859 participants · 1 citation

Abstract

Abstract Background DLX is an IV/oral fluoroquinolone with no QT restrictions, and activity against Gram-positive, Gram-negative and atypical pathogens. DLX is approved for treatment of ABSSSI including those due to MRSA and Gram-negative pathogens. A Phase 3 trial of patients with CABP was recently completed. Methods Global active-comparator double-blind trial; adults with CABP with at least 2 clinical symptoms, physical signs, and radiographic evidence of pneumonia. Randomized 1:1 to DLX or MOX treatment for 5–10 days. Randomization stratified by PORT Class, history of COPD/asthma, and prior single-dose antibiotic use (limit 25%). Patients received a minimum of 3 days IV treatment, then were switched to oral at MD discretion. The primary endpoint for FDA was the Early Clinical Response (ECR): improvement at 96 hours after first dose of study drug in at least 2 of the baseline symptoms in the Intent to Treat (ITT) population. Results 859 patients were randomized; both groups were comparable. Patient characteristics: mean age 60 (range 18–93, 21% ≥ age 75); 58.7% male; 28.6% multi-lobar pneumonia; 26.8% PORT class IV/V. Bacterial pathogens were identified in 60.5% at baseline; most commonly S. pneumoniae, as well as S. aureus, atypicals and Gram-negatives. Patients received treatment ~ 8.5 days (6.3 days of IV, 2.2 days oral). DLX was non-inferior to MOX in ECR 88.9% DLX vs. 89.0% MOX [∆−0.2 (CI -4.4, 4.1)] in the ITT population; ECR in the evaluable population was 91.1% DLX…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 859 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free