Evidence Hub

Comparative efficacy of multiple drugs for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Xiao Z, Li X, Gong J, Zhou F

European journal of medical research, 2025

2,143 participants · 2 citations

Abstract

Background: Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), now referred to as metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD), is the most prevalent chronic liver disease worldwide. However, it remains unclear which drug treatment is more effective. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis to comprehensively compare the efficacy of several potentially beneficial hypoglycemic drugs and vitamin E in treating patients with NAFLD.

Methods: This Bayesian network meta-analysis searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We employed random-effects models to calculate mean differences (MD), relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The study outcomes included anthropometric measurements, biological markers, hepatic fat content, and liver biopsy results. The protocol for this systematic review with network meta-analysis was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42024532600).

Results: This analysis included 26 RCTs with 2143 patients. Based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curve and the network meta-analysis matrix, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RA) demonstrated superior efficacy compared to other interventions, particularly in terms of weight loss, improvement in liver enzymes, resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), reduction of hepatic fat content, glycemic control, and improvement in insulin resistance. Additionally, compared to placebo, sodium-glucose…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a meta-analysis, done in people. Its evidence level is 1 of 5 (Highest · pooled evidence). Pooled evidence from several studies sits at the top of the evidence pyramid. Reported size: 2,143 participants or records.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free