A Multi-Center, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Comparative, Phase II Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Intravenous Infusion With Nemonoxacin Versus Moxifloxacin in Treating Adult Patients With Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to Evaluate the Efficacy, safety and pharmacokinetics of Intravenous Nemonoxacin Compared with Intravenous Moxifloxacin in Adult Patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Conditions: Pneumonia.
Primary outcome: Difference in the Clinical Cure Rate of Two Doses of Intravenously Infused Nemonoxacin Malate Sodium Chloride Injection at Visit 4 in the mITT Population.
Enrollment: 207 participants.
How strong is the evidence?
Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design. Reported size: 207 participants or records.
Read the paper
Related studies
- Structural and topological analysis of thiosemicarbazone-based metal complexes: computational and experimental study of bacterial biofilm inhibition and antioxidant activity
- Toward better cures for Mycobacterium abscessus lung disease
- Challenges for global antibiotic regimen planning and establishing antimicrobial resistance targets: implications for the WHO Essential Medicines List and AWaRe antibiotic book dosing
- Design, Synthesis and In vitro Antitubercular Effect of New Chalcone Derivatives Coupled with 1,2,3‐Triazoles: A Computational Docking Techniques
- Upregulation of pmrA, pmrB, pmrC, phoQ, phoP, and arnT genes contributing to resistance to colistin in superbug Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates from human clinical samples in Tehran, Iran
- Whole-genome sequencing of clinical isolates of Citrobacter Europaeus in China carrying blaOXA−48 and blaNDM−1
Go deeper in Evidence Hub
Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.