Evidence Hub

Clinical Study of Moxifloxacin for Treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia

Daping Fan

Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine, 2011

Abstract

Objective To valuate the clinical effect and safety of Moxifloxacin for treatment of Community Acquired Pneumonia(CAP).MethodsA randomized method was adopted to compare Moxifloxacin 0.4 g/d(test group)with Cefriaxone Soium 2.0 g/d and Azithromycin 0.5/d(control group)for 106 cases of CAP in Hospitalized Patients from Feb 2008 to Jun 2010.After the treatment of 7~14 days,we observed their clinical effect and safety.ResultsCompared with the total efficiency in test group was significantly higher in control group(90.6% vs 79.2%,P0.05);the time of fever vanishing in test group was significantly shorter than that in control group[(2.64±1.33)d vs(5.39±1.25)d,P0.05];the ratio of bacteria cleared out in test group was significantly higher that in control group(87.5% vs 74.3%,P0.05);test group was similar to control group in the ratio of drug side-effect(5.66% vs 7.55%,P0.05).ConclusionMoxifloxacin has better effect and safety for treatment of CAP,so it may be worth of recommending in clinical experiential use for treatment of CAP.

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a randomized trial, done in people. Its evidence level is 2 of 5 (High · randomized trial). Randomized trials of a reasonable size are the strongest single-study design.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free