Evidence Hub

Clinical Characteristics of Five Cases of Chlamydia psittaci Pneumonia Diagnosed Using Metagenomics Next-Generation Sequencing

Wang W, Yan CL, Xue QS

Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2025

5 citations

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to analyze the clinical characteristics of five cases of Chlamydia psittaci pneumonia diagnosed using metagenomics next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and to provide help for its diagnosis and treatment. Methods: Five patients who were admitted to the department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of Beijing Aerospace General Hospital between June 2020 and December 2021 and diagnosed with C. psittaci pneumonia using mNGS were selected, including one case with severe pneumonia. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, epidemiology, laboratory results, treatment, and prognosis of the five participating patients. Results: The main clinical manifestations were high fever, dry cough, chest tightness, shortness of breath, and myalgia. All five patients had a history of contact with poultry. The white blood cell count was normal or slightly increased, the lymphocyte count was significantly decreased, and the percentage of neutrophil granulocyte, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate, and procalcitonin were significantly increased. Chest computed tomography showed inflammatory infiltration and consolidation of one or more lung lobes, possibly accompanied by pleural effusion and liver function impairment. Bronchoscopy mainly showed congestion and edema of airway mucosa with less sputum in the airway. In all patients, we detected the nucleic acid sequences of C. psittaci in alveolar lavage fluid or sputum using mNGS and confirmed the…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free