Evidence Hub

Omadacycline for the Treatment of Severe Chlamydia psittaci Pneumonia Complicated with Guillain-Barre Syndrome

Wang J, Dong S, Fang M, Fan Z, Xu Y

Infection and drug resistance, 2024

9 citations

Abstract

Background: Chlamydia psittaci ( C. psittaci ) is a pathogen that is seldom implicated in community-acquired pneumonia and is rarely linked to severe pneumonia. Reports of severe C. psittaci pneumonia accompanied by Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) are scarce. Tetracyclines are the preferred therapeutic approach for psittacosis. Omadacycline, a novel tetracycline, demonstrates strong antibacterial efficacy against typical bacteria and atypical pathogens, including C. psittaci . However, its application in the treatment of psittacosis pneumonia remains constrained. Case Presentation: A 77-year-old female patient was admitted to the hospital presenting with symptoms of fever, low back pain, and headache. The diagnosis of C. psittaci was established through the utilization of metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS). Initial administration of moxifloxacin, meropenem, piperacillin-tazobactam, and doxycycline proved to be ineffective. Subsequent omadacycline leaded to the successful resolution of fever and dyspnea. However, after the endotracheal tube was removed, the patient experienced a rapid decline in symmetrical limb strength, leading to a diagnosis of GBS based on clinical manifestations, cerebrospinal fluid analysis, and electromyography. Following a 5-day course of immunoglobulin therapy and nutritional nerve treatment, the patient’s condition ameliorated, culminating in an uncomplicated discharge. Conclusion: This case provides evidence supporting the potential use of…

How strong is the evidence?

Evidence Hub reads this as a case report, done in people. Its evidence level is 5 of 5 (Very low · case / narrative / animal / in vitro / in silico). Case reports, narrative reviews, and animal, cell or computer-model studies give the weakest evidence for human health.

How the five levels of evidence work. The level is assigned automatically from the abstract and can be wrong, so check the paper.

Read the paper

Related studies

Go deeper in Evidence Hub

Evidence Hub adds a study data sheet (design, sample size, evidence level, key numbers), an AI summary and a chat grounded in the paper's text.

Open this study Sign up free